Quick Daily Review #43: Cloud Atlas (2012)

cloud atlas

Cloud Atlas (2012)

Director: Lana Wachowski

The best description I have heard of this movie is from a source I cannot recall, but the man (or woman) said about “Cloud Atlas”, that one should imagine a Christmas card written by David Foster Wallace. To those who attempted to read Infinite Jest in their college years to convince themselves they were smarter than they actually were (I am in this group) you will get the reference completely. It is impossible to describe the plot of this movie. The narrative, or narratives, take place over several different periods in history, employ many of the same actors in different roles, and goes back and forth throughout the movie.  Tom Hanks and Halle Berry are both good in several different roles, Berry’s best work being done as a journalist in the 1970s and Hanks as a face painted quasi-Neanderthal in prehistoric times. Other parts of the movie happen in the kind of future that was predicted by DFW in a world controlled by corporations, where fast food workers are created in incubators and are conveniently executed and replaced whenever the service becomes sub-par. To reveal the ultimate theme and purpose of all this would be a spoiler in and of itself. That said, I’m torn on what to say about this movie. It was such a monumental effort that it really should be seen. That said, it took me two days to finish watching it because the framework of the movie tried my patience a great deal. Still though, I’m all for unique movies and creative storytelling, and this is nothing if not a good combination of that.


About William McPherson (359 Articles)
Professional freelance writer, who also writes blogs, reviews, and assorted nonsense at

4 Comments on Quick Daily Review #43: Cloud Atlas (2012)

  1. This film proved to be quite polarizing but I enjoyed it for the most part. Far from perfect and some parts are tough to discern (esp w/ Hanks & Berry’s weird accents) but some of the stories connect w/ me and visually it was a treat. Certainly it was eons better than Jupiter Ascending!


  2. visuals are impressive as heck, but the storyline wasn’t interwoven to the degree that i wanted. i thought that was the thing going on here. but all in all, i liked watching this movie. :D nurse hugo looks funny. lol

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yeah, I agree with you about the storylines. I read before seeing this that the disconnected stories for the most part never directly tie into each other which for a casual viewer is maddening. Still there is depth here and something worth seeing, but I prefer say, your average (not that there is such a thing) Charlie Kaufman movie where you get the same depth and complexity, but the character’s don’t take a backseat to the “gimmickry” for lack of a better word.


Join the Discussion, Share Your Opinion Below

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: